Skip to main content

A Vision for Global Britain


The Prime Minister is soon to make the defining speech of her carrier, as she prepares herself, her impassioned commitment to the referendum result swells strong like a fire fed by the wind. Within just hours of obtaining office, Theresa May assembled a committee for international trade and appointed its first trade minister, Liam Fox in over 43 years. She's taken every opportunity since to state that she wants "Britain to become a global leader in free trade".

Thus far these signs are encouraging. Free trade is an extension of free markets. It allows one to import goods without tariffs and creates competition for otherwise noncompetitive industries, to lower prices on goods and services and to generate wealth and income among impoverished and penurious countries.

It's what made the British Empire strong and in time, if we unlock its great perennial power will provide sustained growth in foreign countries far and above what could be achieved in foreign aid. As members of the European common commercial policy (Customs Union) we've so far been unable to sign our own trade deals.

But with a level head, a hardy heart and prior communication on trade deals with the US and New Zealand, the UK is in a fundamentally strong position to charter new territory in the upcoming UK-EU negotiations. Still its clear that this by itself, is not enough. In order to make that first step toward a truly "global Britain" the Prime Minister must negotiate first a non-discriminatory immigration policy, that does not favor unskilled labor from the European Union over their better trained counter parts from non-EU countries.

Second she must also negotiate the right to repeal any EU law and regulations and must become fully detached from all existing EU structures. Its implied then that this will require a vote in parliament to repeal the European Communities Act (1972) which gave supremacy of European law over UK law, independent of the triggering of Article 50, set for the end of March.


Whatever benefit it may once have offered to abandon the plurality of a diverse and global market such as the Common Wealth, with "agrarian, commodity-based, industrial and service economies" for merger in a political institution, it does not benefit us today. After all the purpose of free trade is to buy and sell what you don't already have.

The UK has been hit harder by external tariff barriers than any other member of the block. Trade with the EU is in deficit and falling. It makes up only 10 per cent of GDP. Whereas trade with non-EU countries makes up at least 11 per cent, and even though only 6 per cent of businesses trade into the single market the whole lot are slapped down by all EU regulations. Tying every part of ourselves lock, stock and barrel to the only shrinking customs union in the world.

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) the EU is worth only 17 per cent of global GDP as compared to 36 per cent in the 1970s and that "growth" is currently stagnating. In the following years it will be outgrown by NAFTA and China.

Brexit is an opportunity, not the leave Europe but to join the rest of the world. It is the entire world whom we belong to and the whole of humanity with which we are part.

Comments

  1. P.S. Theresa May's 12-point plan appears to accommodate everything I had hoped for! I'm so happy 😊

    ReplyDelete
  2. Quoted Daniel Hannan "Why Vote Leave"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Margaret Thatcher's Legacy for Britain

The following is an adaptation of my thoughts at UCL's Conservative Society some months ago concerning the issue of the Conservative Parties vote of no confidence that lead to the resignation of Margaret Thatcher, her legacy for Britain and why she's so undeserving hated by the hard left.


When one enters parliament through members lobby there are four prime ministers commemorated and immortalized in statue form. The first of these figures, David Lloyd George seeded the beginnings of the welfare state, the second Winston Churchill served his tenure protecting us from physical annihilation during the Second World War, the third, Clement Attlee nationalized the health service and sought to drive Britain down the road of socialism and the fourth, the late Baroness Thatcher brought great economic revolution at the end of the Cold War.

It's been said of British politics that these last two figures though diametrically opposed were the only elections that ever really mattered. B…

Can inflation be eternal into the past?

Back in 2003 a paper appeared on the arXiv titled "Inflationary spacetimes are not past complete" that was published by Arvind Borde, Alan Guth and Alexander Vilenkin which has had considerable amounts of attention online. The theorem is rather uninteresting but simple and doesn't require a very complicated understanding of math. So I thought I'd explain the result here.

It's purpose is to demonstrate that inflationary models are geodesically incomplete into the past which they take as "synonymous to a beginning" but Vilenkin stresses that the theorem can be extended to non inflationary models so long as the condition of the theorem that the average rate of expansion is never below zero is met. These models too then are incomplete into the past. Consider the metric for an FRW universe with an exponential expansion


Where the scale factor is


Since the eternal inflation model is a "steady state cosmology" the mass density and the Hubble paramet…

'Don't boo Labour, vote Conservative!' #ImWithHer

"My pitch is very simple, I'm Theresa May and I believe I'm the best person to be Prime Minister"

In an election one doesn't always get the option of voting for their primary candidate, for me that's been the case here. Originally I had supported Michael Gove and then Andrea Leadsom for leadership of the Conservative party but on June 8th we're expected to choose between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn. Whatever you think of the two personally, the choice of who offers better governance couldn't be clearer.

The most notable part of Jeremy Corbyn's "leadership" has been his support for the outrageous and policies of the far left. He supports the unilateral disarmament of British nuclear weapons, while supporting the right of Iran to have its own unrestricted nuclear program. He's had an industrial policy to nationalize the mining of coal but not to burn coal, and supports self-determination for the people of Palestine but not for the p…