Skip to main content

Lets Not Ally Ourselves With Putin

I'm somewhat amazed, every now and again being confronted somewhere on social media by a fellow eurosceptic who offers praise of Vladimir Putin. Whether its Diane James, Lubos Motl, Donald Trump, Peter Hitchens, Nigel Farage, George Galloway or Marine Le Pen people have somehow worked their way into this odd line of thought that "my enemies' enemy is my friend" even when the subject of that redemption is an authoritarian war criminal.

Let me be clear, I voted to leave the European Union, I value the rule of law, parliamentary democracy and personal liberty. Which the EU has replaced with the endless political integration, an unelected ruling body of bureaucrats and a tidal wave of unamendable regulation which has made us both poorer and our markets less liberal. But when I extend that same political philosophy to what goes on in the Russian state, where journalists and dissidents are murdered, where anti-corruption opposition (Mikhail Khodorkovsky) are imprisoned and where neighboring countries are under constant threat I'm lead to that same understanding.

So ingrained in his ideology is totalitarianism, that before Putin had ever even become president, while he was still Prime Minister under Boris Yeltsen, in 1999 he lead an intervention and annexation of Chechnya in reaction to several apartment bombings that took place across Russia. The war indiscriminately killed at least twenty five thousand people - but here's the truly perfunctory catch - there's no actual evidence that Chechen terrorists were ever responsible because it was never investigated. When Boris Berezovsky uncovered a public call connected to the attacks, in Ryazan shortly after, it was traced back to the Federal Security Services of the Russian state, itself. Others critical of the Chechen war like journalist Anna Politkovskaya were subsequently murdered.

Though you'd still be forgiven perhaps, for believing that we've never tried to work with Putin, if some of the people I mentioned earlier were all you had to go by. George Bush back in 2001, when US-Russia relations were strong, sought after long term friendship with Russia but by 2008 found himself engaged in a proxy war over Georgia when Russia invaded the country.

Again when Barack Obama was newly elected, he lifted the sanctions on Russian arm exports which were equipping Iran with a deadly stock pile of weapons, signed a nuclear arms reduction treaty that drastically reduced armaments and even opened a transit root through Russia to supply American troops in Afghanistan. But this too was short lived, as just a few years later Putin's Russia would invade another neighbor, Ukraine and this time annexed Crimea, after protests in Kiev lead to the ousting of Viktor Yanukovytch as president. Pro-Russian Ukraine separatists supported by Putin, would shoot down the Malaysian air line, all while intimidation tactics through military exercises were gathering at the border during the Crimea status referendum of 2014.

Just imagine how Crimean tartars, many ethnically cleansed from their land by Joseph Stalin, must have felt after a long anticipated dream of democratic independence, only to have been met over the horizon by Russian tanks, to be subsumed into a shadow USSR - the Eurasian Economic Union - all for the sake of self-sufficiency off the tax receipts of oil and natural gas revenues. Yet still having contracted for more than two consecutive quarters the Russian economy is in recession, the intervention incurred sanctions and disrupted important trade links. Not least, the greater tragedy of the many lives lost in Donbass. Like Mussolini's Italo-Ethiopian war no measurable advantage was gained, other than a display of power, a postponing of electoral defeat and the retention of influence in the region.

The case of Syria isn't far removed, under the guise of repelling ISIS, Russia has bombed hospitals, schools and civilian populated areas to target anti-Assad forces immersed in the population. He's backed the Syrian dictator, supplying him with weapons and fighter planes. Leaving us all to wonder if he is really incapable of shame. Meanwhile across Europe he's launched propaganda campaigns against Petro Poroshenko, Emanuel Macaron and Angela Merkel.

Domestically Putin's regime is entirely corrupt. He's spent his carrier in politics rising through the echelons of the Kremlin on a wave of money laundering, both collaborating and propping up crime monopolies all while squandering public money on loans for close personal friends. The state has been reduced to a shallow imitation of a democracy, even excluding from consideration the monopoly the state has over the media, the most recent election he won on the pretext that opposition candidates were not allowed to campaign and were only selected on the ballot with granted permission of the Kremlin.

Should we engage with Russia for mutual interest? Absolutely but should we seek an alliance? Certainly not, if Putin throws down the gauntlet over the territorial integrity of Eastern Europe, Donald Trump must be willing to pick it up. Because truly nothing can shame this man . . . 


Popular posts from this blog

Margaret Thatcher's Legacy for Britain

The following is an adaptation of my thoughts at UCL's Conservative Society some months ago concerning the issue of the Conservative Parties vote of no confidence that lead to the resignation of Margaret Thatcher, her legacy for Britain and why she's so undeserving hated by the hard left.

When one enters parliament through members lobby there are four prime ministers commemorated and immortalized in statue form. The first of these figures, David Lloyd George seeded the beginnings of the welfare state, the second Winston Churchill served his tenure protecting us from physical annihilation during the Second World War, the third, Clement Attlee nationalized the health service and sought to drive Britain down the road of socialism and the fourth, the late Baroness Thatcher brought great economic revolution at the end of the Cold War.

It's been said of British politics that these last two figures though diametrically opposed were the only elections that ever really mattered. B…

Can inflation be eternal into the past?

Back in 2003 a paper appeared on the arXiv titled "Inflationary spacetimes are not past complete" that was published by Arvind Borde, Alan Guth and Alexander Vilenkin which has had considerable amounts of attention online. The theorem is rather uninteresting but simple and doesn't require a very complicated understanding of math. So I thought I'd explain the result here.

It's purpose is to demonstrate that inflationary models are geodesically incomplete into the past which they take as "synonymous to a beginning" but Vilenkin stresses that the theorem can be extended to non inflationary models so long as the condition of the theorem that the average rate of expansion is never below zero is met. These models too then are incomplete into the past. Consider the metric for an FRW universe with an exponential expansion

Where the scale factor is

Since the eternal inflation model is a "steady state cosmology" the mass density and the Hubble paramet…

'Don't boo Labour, vote Conservative!' #ImWithHer

"My pitch is very simple, I'm Theresa May and I believe I'm the best person to be Prime Minister"

In an election one doesn't always get the option of voting for their primary candidate, for me that's been the case here. Originally I had supported Michael Gove and then Andrea Leadsom for leadership of the Conservative party but on June 8th we're expected to choose between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn. Whatever you think of the two personally, the choice of who offers better governance couldn't be clearer.

The most notable part of Jeremy Corbyn's "leadership" has been his support for the outrageous and policies of the far left. He supports the unilateral disarmament of British nuclear weapons, while supporting the right of Iran to have its own unrestricted nuclear program. He's had an industrial policy to nationalize the mining of coal but not to burn coal, and supports self-determination for the people of Palestine but not for the p…